> > What laughable bullshit!
>
> >     Here I want to discuss a short argument for this
> >     conclusion which would probably be accepted as
> >     sound, with perhaps some qualifications, by almost
> >     all philosophers who hold the view that using
> >     animals in scientific research is wrong.
>
> > In other words, people who have *ALREADY* reached the
> > very conclusion you're attempting to prove!  HA HA HA
> > HA HA!  You fucking DILETTANTE fruit!  "Philosopher" my
> > ass...
>
> Is that your response, then?

Yes, you circular fuckwit.  You explicitly acknowledge that you are
assuming the very thing you are tasked with proving.  What a fucking
chump.